The futility of selling early — Mind CTI again

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

446822940_bf49440a9c_b (1)Having read my earlier postings about a programmatic approach to investment by way of MNDO (start here,) the equity of Mind CTI, and my earlier postings about the potential folly of dividend speculation (start here,) a reader of this blog suggested to me that selling ones position of MNDO immediately before the ex-dividend date would be an appropriate strategy, capitalizing on the — and I quote — “stupidity” of the dividend speculators.

Although the notion of capitalizing on the greed and ignorance of dividend speculators does appeal to me, I do not believe the reader’s approach to be long-term viable.

The issue is one of tax, liquidity, transaction expenses, and timing.

Assuming a cyclic behavior consisting of sell-before-ex-dividend-date followed by buy-after-price-drop, which, of course, implies a holding period of less than 12 months, the investor would be subject to taxation on a short term basis, which for me, for instance, effectively would result in a Federal income tax hit climbing towards 40%, supplemented by a state and local tax bordering on 10%, for a total tax bordering on 50%.

Had I, for instance, acquired $100 thousand worth of shares in 2013 at an average price per share of $1.75, amounting to approximately 55 thousand shares, and sold these at today’s rate ($2.30 per share,) my pre-tax yield would be $125 thousand, or so (accounting for transaction expenses and supply/demand pricing issues,) for a net pre-tax gain of $25,000 and a post-tax gain of $12,500.

Naturally, this approach raises demand for liquidity and is impacted by transaction issues and expenses — and, importantly, it is characterized by a per share price risk and the broad assumption that the price will not go up immediately after the ex-dividend date adjustment. Moreover, the ugly pairing of requirement for superb timing (the cause of death of many a trader) and risk comes into play — in particular since it is ultimately impossible to know, for sure that: (1) an initial position can be secured, (2) that the initial position can be sold at a the required premium, (3) that a later position can be secured, and (4) that a dividend will actually occur.

A 12.5% gain on a six to nine months investment is, of course, not shabby when compared to the average 0% interest that your local bank savings account carries, but it does not in any way perform substantially better in the long run than does the pure dividend play, which with more than 55,000 shares, no transaction costs, and, critically, no per share price risk, handily and consistently delivers more than $12,000 after taxes, assuming a dividend taxation of 15%, and produces more shares — and thus more dividends — year after year.

Now, it would, of course, be possible to argue that applying this strategy for a position held in an tax-advantageous retirement vehicle such as an IRA might work (it would certainly negate some of the tax issues,) but, generally, tax-advantageous retirement vehicle are best suited for long term hold strategies and the use of these vehicles for other investment strategies is something that should be thought through very carefully.

Donations, please….

As usual, if you found this posting useful or entertaining — or if it saved you time, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $10 is suggested — however, any donation is, of course, appreciated.


Please, sir, I want some more — Mind CTI redux

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

2163042781_29c776780e_oEarlier, I wrote about a programmatic approach to investment related to Mind CTI Ltd and its equity MNDO, laying out a simple formula that would have yielded an estimated 388% gain over a five year period:

(1) settle in for a long run, (2) pony up $100,000, (3) every year re-invest the entire dividend payout (less a mandatory 25% (or so.. the amount varies from year to year) dividend tax withholding) by buying additional shares exactly 90 days after the previous dividend was paid out, and (4) — and this is the really important step — ignore any and all temptation to trade the equity, game the system, or cash in on short term gains in the per share price.

My posting (read it here) generated quite a lot of traffic and follow-up questions, in particular after Mind CTI announced is fourth quarter and full year results for its fiscal year 2013 (read more about this here,) and — again — announced a REIT like dividend.

So without further ado, I provide more information related to my rudimentary modeling.

First, here is the previously published results table, updated with information about an element that I had not commented on: A U.S. tax credit available on top of the discussed position gains, amounting to almost $22 thousand over the period in question:

(c) Per Jacobsen, 2013 and 2014. All rights reserved

(c) Per Jacobsen, 2013 and 2014. All rights reserved

Please note that these computations are really rudimentary, making very simple assumptions about the tax rates and trade viability across the periods.

Ok, now that we got the disclaimer, let’s look at the evolution in position value, not including the $22 thousand tax credit:

(c) Per Jacobsen, 2013 and 2014. All rights reserved

(c) Per Jacobsen, 2013 and 2014. All rights reserved

We note a couple of interesting things…

First, the position value was at its peak ($518 thousand) in april of 2011, immediately prior to the exit of a very large institutional holder, whose position liquidation caused a drastic drop in the per share price.

Second, the position value was at its low ($59 thousand) in March of 2009, reflecting the overall market conditions.

Third, the appreciation since the low (from a low of $59 thousand to a high of $518 thousand) has been enormous, and to deviate from the programmatic approach when the position value dropped in conjunction with the market would have been a blunder of the highest magnitude.

When reflecting on the third point it is important to remember that a proper analysis of Mind CTI would have uncovered a very healthy, debt-free, cash-flow positive, and consistently dividend-paying business, and, so, it should have been clear that the market gyrations were — fundamentally — irrelevant.

So, in the immortal words of Mr. Bumble:

“Come, Oliver! Wipe your eyes with the cuffs of your jacket, and don’t cry into your gruel; that’s a very foolish action, Oliver.”

That’s it. Have a nice day.

Donations, please….

As usual, if you found this posting useful or entertaining — or if it saved you time, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $25 is suggested — however, any donation is, of course, appreciated.


Mind CTI is prepared for 2014

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

2178452403_a7ddd24205_o

Onwards and up

Mind CTI Ltd. released its financial results for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 and full fiscal year 2014 on Tuesday, February 25th, 2014.

As usual, I have summarized these results and my commentary on these in a dynamic posting that you can find here. The dynamic posting also provides summaries of previous quarters’ results and associated commentaries.

After several quarters of re-gearing, with added expenses and headcount and lowered operating income, the company ended its fiscal year with a bang, turning in a fourth quarter that was way better than expected, establishing a significant foothold for the 2014 fiscal year, and paying its patient shareholders a significant dividend.

On the back-end of significant wins in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, the company appears very optimistic about fiscal year 2014 and it backed this confidence up with a $0.24 dividend, payable in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, and constituting a 10% yield or better (read more about the very special dividend situation for Mind CTI here.)

For more information, please refer to the dynamic posting (here.)

Donations, please….

As usual, if you found this posting useful or entertaining — or if it saved you time, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $10 is suggested — however, any donation is, of course, appreciated.


No Comment: What speculation looks like — MTSL/MER Telemanagement

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

Revenue and margin drop off — Volcano eruptions in per share price

MTSL chart R-O-O chart3

And… From the company’s 20-F filing for fiscal year 2012:

During 2012, Simple Mobile was acquired by TracFone and in October 2012, we renewed our agreement with them to provide for minimum monthly payments of $300,000 during the year ending December 31, 2013. Recently, we were advised that TracFone intends to migrate the hosted billing services to their own platform. It is unlikely that we will receive significant revenues from TracFone in 2014, which will adversely affect our operating results.

And… extracted from the company’s 20-F filings from fiscal years 2008 through 2012:

2010 - 2012 Revenues MTSL -- Adjusted

References

Recognizing Speculation in Equities – MER Telemanagement Solutions redux
Chicken coming home to roost
The sting of the scorpion – MER Telemanagement Solutions proves me right… again
Stand Fast — The near-final chapter of the saga of MER Telemanagement Solutions

Dont be a Mooch!

If you have enjoyed or think you will benefit from this posting, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $10 is suggested.


A paradigm for programmatic investment — 388% gain with Mind CTI

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

ISO-computer3Tomorrow, February 25th, 2014, Mind CTI Ltd. releases its financial results for its 2013 fiscal year.

As the reader of this blog probably knows by now, Mind CTI is an Israeli company that I follow with a lot of interest and believes yields a significant earnings opportunity for investor.

A quick glance at Mind CTI does not reveal something very exciting. The company is small and its equity is trading at the sub-$5 level of a micro-cap stock.

Look behind the facade, however, and you will find an extra-ordinary dividend investment opportunity anchored in a rock-solid company with a stellar record of producing lots of cash, providing something quite unique: The opportunity to make substantial gains through a programmatic investment paradigm — the holy grail for any long-term investor.

I will explain, but first let me provide some background.

In 2008/2009, the per share price of MNDO, the Nasdaq traded equity of Mind CTI, experienced significant troubles because of the company’s investment of approximately $20 million into inherently worthless Auction Rate Securities (read more about how that came about on Mind CTI’s Wikipedia entry (here) — a tale of fraud and deceit by professionals in the securities industry) and in spite of a rock-solid operation and stable cash-flow.

Had you in 2008, when the company’s shares in a reaction to the Auction Rate Securities debacle reached a per share price level of less than $1, analyzed the company’s situation and fundamentals and reached the conclusion that the Auction Rate Securities issue was annoying, but, fundamentally, irrelevant, you could have acquired MNDO shares cheaply.

Had you also recognized that Mind CTI’s operational and cash-flow performance was not a fluke, you could have laid out a very simple mechanism for generating very substantial long-term gains: (1) settle in for a long run, (2) pony up $100,000, (3) every year re-invest the entire dividend payout (less a mandatory 25% (or so.. the amount varies from year to year) dividend tax withholding) by buying additional shares exactly 90 days after the previous dividend was paid out, and (4) — and this is the really important step — ignore any and all temptation to trade the equity, game the system, or cash in on short term gains in the per share price.

Had you done so, you would today be holding 177 thousand shares, valued at $380 thousand if you liquidated your position now, or — if you were to keep applying the programmatic approach, generating $42 thousand in dividend in 2014.

Moreover, should you decide to liquidate your position, it will be taxed on the basis of a long-term investment at a rate of 15%, making your post-tax payout $338 thousand, for a post-tax gain of $238 thousand, or a 338% return on your investment. More importantly, however, you had achieved this staggering return with near-zero risk, negligible heart-burn, limited transaction expenses, no portfolio oversight, and no exhausting discussions with the IRS — in other words with little or no fuss. It would quite literally be the easiest money that you ever made.

Here is an immensely simplified table showing how this would have gone down:

(c) Per Jacobsen, 2013 and 2014. All rights reserved

(c) Per Jacobsen, 2013 and 2014. All rights reserved

Now, if you had followed MIND CTI in detail, you may also have arrived at the conclusion that the company’s intrinsic value exceeds its market value by a significant margin (read here about Mr. Igor Novgorodtsev’s conclusion that the gap is 40% to 56%) and that the per share price of MNDO would grow to $5, $7.50, or $10 over 3 years, and, so, you may conclude that 177 thousand shares alone (i.e. not including the increase in shares that you would experience over the next three years,) would reach a value of $884 thousand, $1.3 million, or 1.8 million, respectively.

Ok, I hear Hold it a minute buddy…. Surely, the depressed value is a function of the dividend policy and resulting payouts, and, so, there cannot be any gains.

Well, not really. In an efficient market, a conservative no-debt company that consistently throws off the sort of dividends that we are talking about here (a yield of between 10% and 20%) should be worth far more than Mind CTI’s capitalization implies.

Ok, so let’s assume that we put the efficient market aside for a second… If Mind CTI was to suspend its dividend, then the cash being horded would automatically — and dramatically — increase the company’s value (and, presumably, its market capitalization.)

And guess what? If the company did not suspend its dividend, then the worst thing that would happen to an investor would be that he or she would be provided with an option to let the programmatic approach continue to do its job, offering a continuous accumulation of MNDO shares.

Even in an inefficient market, the per share price of MNDO will, of course, eventually, go up, as it did in 2011 when it exceeded $3.45, probably at part of a cycle where the financial market turns away from flashy social media shares with excessive valuation and seek out solid, debt-free, cash-producing companies such as Mind CTI.

By the way. Had you, in our not-so-hypothetical scenario, exited in 2011, at a per share price of $3.45, you would have netted $500 thousand before taxes or $440 thousand on a post-tax basis. Not shabby for an investment that does not have the sex appeal of Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn.

Donations, please….

As usual, if you found this posting useful or entertaining — or if it saved you time, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $25 is suggested — however, any donation is, of course, appreciated.


No Comment: JOEZ is rocking again

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

Third day of intensive institutional buying in a 14 day period

JOEZ Rocking - 1

References

Joe Versus the Volcano — Joe’s Jeans erupts
No Comment: What is the question? — Joe’s Jeans
No Comment: What’s the difference — Joe’s Jeans

Dont be a Mooch!

If you have enjoyed or think you will benefit from this posting, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $10 is suggested.


No Comment: What’s the difference — Joe’s Jeans

As it is the case for all postings in this blog, my standard disclaimers apply for this posting.  However, since this posting discusses investments, I urge you to review the disclaimers laid out in the About section with extra diligence. Moreover, even if you have already reviewed these disclaimers in the past, you need to review them again, as they are subject to change without notice.  Do it now, and remember that whatever I say in this blog posting is simply my opinion — it is not science, it is not advice, and it is not an attempt to make you act in any way whatsoever.

…. And, if you find yourself enjoying this posting, consider supporting the blog through a donation. For your convenience, PayPal links are provided to the right and at the end of the posting.

Finding the tipping point — The metrics to watch

Joez 2

References

Joe Versus the Volcano — Joe’s Jeans erupts
No Comment: What is the question? — Joe’s Jeans

Dont be a Mooch!

If you have enjoyed or think you will benefit from this posting, you can express your appreciation through donation via PayPal right now.   For this type of posting a one-off donation of $10 is suggested.